International Standby Practices (ISP98) offers a precise and detailed framework for practitioners dealing with standby letters of credit. The current version is ISP98, ICC Publication No For information on ISP98 and standby letters of credit, see Practice note, Bonds, guarantees and standby. The 89 Rules in International Standby Practices (ISP98) offer a precise and detailed framework for practitioners dealing with standby letters of credit. Developed.
|Published (Last):||25 July 2007|
|PDF File Size:||1.33 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.26 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
However, one may wish to include such second sentence out of an abundance of caution and to alert the beneficiary and other relevant parties e.
ISP98 is expected to become widely used for standby letters of credit commencing January 1, It also provides that taking beyond seven business days is deemed unreasonable. Thus, each presented document need only comply with the requirements provided in the letter of credit for such document. For instance, if the letter of credit requires presentation of a drawing certificate stating that attached thereto is original stock certificate no.
See Article 1 opt-out. Automatic extension clauses and automatic reinstatement or reduction clauses are permitted.
ISP 98- International Standby Practices
ISP98 can also be used for independent demand guarantees. If the letter of credit permits the presentation of only “copies” see Rule 4.
Create an account My account Login Lost password Shopping basket. Issuer may want an express provision that it is not obligated to effect an assignment where prohibited by any applicable law or regulation or where it is not required by any applicable law or regulation to effect an assignment.
ISP98 Application may also provide mechanism to resolve disputes between applicant and issuer as well as corresponding choice of law for application.
An invaluable source of practical information for trade finance professionals and academics! UCP reflects letter of credit practice more generally. No need to state that letter of credit is irrevocable, or that issuer’s obligations are independent and not conditioned on payment by applicant or anyone else.
If presentation of the original letter of credit is not a condition to transfer drawing rights, the letter of credit must so state. A new set of Rules was therefore required for this workhorse of commerce and finance ixp98 ISP 98 fills this important gap in the market place. Beneficiaries may also request a provision stating the consequences if the issuer fails to reopen for business within a specified time period. See also current UCC Article 9 on secured transactions and proposed UCC Revised Article 9 specifying where assignment may be made despite contractual provision prohibiting assignment.
ISP International Standby Practices | ICC Store
This rule in effect shortens the one-year UCC Revised Article 5 statute of limitations for a wrongful honor claim UCC Revised Section and explicitly addresses some of the issues recently litigated in Oei v. UCC Revised Article 5.
If it is desired that the documents must also be examined for inconsistency, then the letter of credit should so provide. If “exact” or “identical” wording is wanted in drawing documents, it must be expressly required in the letter of credit. There is no such automatic exclusion for ISP Consider whether the name of the transferee must or may be used in place of the name of the transferor on is;98 drawing documents. Issuers may usp98 wish to deal in their letter of credit application forms with issues raised by claimed successors.
Requiring Invoices Under Standby LCs In the current double issue of Documentary Credit World, an experienced trade Finance Head decries the practice of requiring invoices under standby LCs, putting forth an interesting example to elicit reader comments.
The precise place for presentation should be specified in the letter of credit. The New International Standby Practices. The presenter should decide if it believes the documents are discrepant osp98 it asks for a waiver or should consider reserving its right to assert that the documents are not discrepant If the letter of credit requires presentation of negotiable or otherwise valuable documents, the letter of credit should provide for disposition return of the documents upon dishonor.
ISP98 became effective on 1 January Getting Ready for ISP If it is intended that presentation isp9 be made by fax, the letter of credit should so state. ISP98 avoids these problems and anticipates issues that commonly arise under standby practice.
Getting Ready for ISP98: The New International Standby Practices
If substitution is not desired, idp98 letter of credit should expressly provide that the name of a transferee may not be used in place of the name of the original beneficiary on certain drawing documents or in specified places on those documents.
Both beneficiaries and issuers may want to avoid the rigors of Rule 4. ISP98 was designed not only for bankers who already knew the practices being articulated, but also for iso98 and corporate users who may not be intimately familiar with them, usp98 ultimately judges who must izp98 disputes. A cover instruction accompanying the presentation may specify to whom notice of dishonor should be sent and what means of telecommunication should be used to transmit the notice.
ISP98 reflects a distillation of practices from a wide range of standby users: Do not say “partial drawings prohibited” unless the beneficiary is only permitted to draw once for the full amount. Parties may wish to specify to whom and by what means any notice of dishonor must be given, otherwise notice must be given to the presenter by telecommunication, if possible.
You have no items in your shopping cart. Though standby letters of credit have similarities with commercial letters of credit and other financial instrument, there are significant differences in scope and practice. If the letter of credit requires presentation of negotiable documents, instruments or certificates, the letter of credit should specify whether, how or to whom endorsement must be made, otherwise endorsement will not be required.
This risk is greatest where there are multiple nominated persons, as is the case with a freely negotiable credit.